Engineering Education Review
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> <p> The complex and ever-changing world, as the rapid development of new technologies present unprecedented opportunities and challenges to engineering education, which propels social progress and determines the future of humanity. However, there is not a special review of engineering education journal.</p> <p><strong>aims and scope</strong></p> <p>Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this journal focuses on professional development, aim to display cutting-edge and topical issues, to lead disciplinary innovation, and to promote academic communications. The journal publishes critical analysis, summary, and evaluation of previous research to expand new perspectives, to guide paradigm shifts in engineering education, and to improve academic discourse and practice systems.</p> <p><strong>target audience</strong></p> <p>Experts and scholars engaged in the field of engineering education, teachers and students of primary and secondary schools, universities, researchers in research institutions, educational policy makers and implementers of various countries, etc.</p> <p><strong>covered disciplines or sub-disciplines</strong><strong>(> 10 Hot topics should be listed)</strong></p> <ul> <li>engineering science education</li> <li>engineering technology education</li> <li>engineering management education</li> <li>engineering culture education</li> <li>global trends and frontiers in engineering education</li> <li>engineering education strategy research</li> <li>reform and practice of engineering education</li> <li>comparative analysis of regional engineering education</li> <li>interdisciplinary engineering education</li> <li>soft science research in engineering education.</li> </ul> <p>other topics related with engineering education.</p>Scholar Media Publishingen-USEngineering Education Review2959-6890Venturing into the "uninhabited zone" to explore the path of artificial intelligence
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/628
<p> As a significant breakthrough in the field of natural language processing, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer's <br />(ChatGPT's) powerful language generation and transfer capabilities have not only changed the way of human-computer <br />interaction, but also had a revolutionary impact on multiple industries. Currently, to develop the third generation of artificial <br />intelligence (AI), issues related to knowledge, data, algorithm innovation, computational resources, and ethics need to be <br />addressed. The Chinese model is mainly application-driven, but the basic theoretical research is relatively weak. The <br />development history of AI shows that realizing artificial general intelligence still faces enormous challenges. In the upsurge of <br />AI, we should remain calm and scrutinize its potential risks. China should increase the intensity of basic theoretical research, <br />attract global talent, and jointly promote the healthy and sustainable development of the field of AI.</p> Bo Zhang
Copyright (c) 2024 Bo Zhang
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-232024-10-2322456510.54844/eer.2024.0628Cultivating resilience in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/630
<p>Resilience plays an essential role in engineering education, as it affects not only students' academic performance and <br />professional achievements (e.g., adaptability, self-efficacy, self-control, optimism, persistence) but also the professional and <br />personal well-being of both students and educators. This review focuses on resilience in education for science, technology, <br />engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors, highlighting distinct conceptualizations of resilience, recent empirical research <br />on resilience in STEM education, and the role of discourses, narratives, and social interactions in enhancing resilience <br />enactment. In conclusion, we emphasize the need for pedagogical strategies to foster resilience enactment in STEM <br />education and propose possible directions for future research.</p>Eubin SungLiming LiuKai Kuang
Copyright (c) 2024 Eubin Sung, Liming Liu, Kai Kuang
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-242024-10-2422667110.54844/eer.2024.0630Facilitating outstanding engineering faculty members through training from recruitment to retirement
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/562
<p>Most of the higher engineering education institutions don't focus on continuous training of their faculty members from <br />recruitment to retirement (R to R). Because of this, the quality of performance of untrained faculty members gradually <br />reduces and this impacts the attributes of their graduates, sporadic contribution to knowledge capital, and poor return on <br />the investments (ROI) in engineering education. There is a need for an integrated and dynamic model for the training and <br />development of engineering faculty members. The objectives of this research are to assess the literature on faculty <br />development; to identify the total needs of the engineering faculty members from recruitment to retirement (R to R); to <br />suggest effective and efficient methods of planned faculty development; and to validate the suggested process of <br />development through a set of engineering institutions. The action research method has been adopted to assess the global <br />literature, and consult multinational companies, local engineering companies, and alumni on their needs. It is found that <br />‘Faculty Development Courses’ are required for all engineering faculty members from entry to exit to facilitate meritocracy. A <br />critical review of the literature revealed that most of the researchers have focused their research on entry-level faculty <br />members or some middle-level faculty members. Only a few institutes focused on the senior members. Hence, this study <br />focused on lifelong faculty development courses from entry-level to exit level. The training needs assessment was based on <br />the feedback from 396 entry-level faculty members who were purposefully included in this research. The outcomes are <br />presented in seven parts: (1) Entry-level faculty development programs (FDPs), (2) Getting recognized, (3) Middle-level FDPs, <br />(4) Student personnel administration, (5) Senior-level FDPs, (6) Advanced-level FDPs, and (7) Radical innovations. This <br />research provides a 360-degree assessment and creates a guide both for the educational administrators and faculty <br />members to reach excellence. Learning is a lifelong process. The suggestions were validated through a set five of <br />institutions. and they started implementing them. The continuous process of faculty development from recruitment to <br />retirement has been appreciated but it may take several years to institutionalize it. Limitations of this study are a smaller <br />number of faculty members (396) and suggestions for future research have also been indicated. This gave a promising cost<br />effective faculty development process at every stage of faculty growth and resulted in outstanding institutes with high<br />performing faculty members. Further, these faculty members contributed to human and knowledge capital.</p>Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
Copyright (c) 2024 Thanikachalam Vedhathiri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-232024-10-2322779110.54844/eer.2024.0562Study on Engineering Capability Cultivation of Postgraduate with University-Enterprise Joint Projects
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/602
<p>The engineering capability of industry is very important for nation, especially in this fast developing stage of technology. Postgraduates are the candidates of engineering talents. We discussed the related works in current researches and policies of cultivation about postgraduates. Aimed at the problems in cultivating postgraduates' engineering ability in university & enterprise joint projects, the multi dimensional cooperation is proposed. First, the collaborative framework of cultivation is analyzed. Secondly, we proposed the directions that needs to be enhanced or weakened in cultivation procedures. Thirdly, three real cases were brought forth and analyzied while dealing with university-enterprise joint projects. The methods handled here are able to help those universities, mentors, postgraduates and enterprises altogether when improving postgraduate's engineering capability in university-enterprise joint projects.</p>Wende KeYan WeiChengzhi HuYongsheng MaDong LuLei KouYexu Huang
Copyright (c) 2024 Wende Ke, Yan Wei, Chengzhi Hu, Yongsheng Ma, Dong Lu, Lei Kou, Yexu Huang
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-242024-10-24229210010.54844/eer.2024.0602 Innovative engineering education for a better future
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/564
<p> The world is now changing almost continuously and very rapidly. Multifaceted challenges are facing humanity. Great minds <br />have highlighted that you cannot solve problems on the same level of consciousness that created it. Better engineering is a <br />basis to give our planet and our people the best possible perspective. It can ensure a safer, more fair, healthier, more <br />efficient and peaceful future. To improve the world in a sustainable and an ethically responsible manner, future engineers <br />need the best possible education. Students should learn to develop and apply better technologies, and universities have a <br />responsibility to deliver them outstanding knowledge based on best possible methods. In the applied sciences know-how <br />should not only be generated and transferred within academic circles but should be primarily used in real life. Theory has to <br />be integrated with practice. In the classroom engineering students should be empowered to meet challenges in life, at the <br />working place and beyond. This paper introduces a innovative approach in engineering education based on the cases of <br />work-integrated study programs at the Hainan Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences in Hainan, China.</p>Jürgen Kretschmann
Copyright (c) 2024 Jürgen Kretschmann
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-242024-10-242210110810.54844/eer.2024.0564 Integration of science and education: Reform and practice of innovative talent cultivation model in the field of communication engineering
https://test.hxts-bj.com/journals/eer/article/view/619
Guang WuQingfeng Zhang
Copyright (c) 2024 Guang Wu, Qingfeng Zhang
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
2024-10-242024-10-2422727610.54844/eer.2024.0619