The "Five Forces Model" and strategies for enhancing the influence of scientific journals

Abstract

Background: Based on relevant theory of science of science, we aimed to construct a model for evaluating the influence of science journals and thereby propose strategies to enhance their impact. Methods: By using methods such as a literature review, in-depth interviews, and a concept analysis, we considered various aspects related to science journals, including knowledge production, flow, and dissemination, and developed what we call the "Five Forces Model, " along with countermeasures and suggestions. Results: We identified knowledge power, persuasiveness, management power, expressiveness, and dissemination power as the five aspects that determine the influence of science journals. The Five Forces Model was built using these five aspects. Conclusion: Influence development and enhancement are integrated processes among science journals. Theories on knowledge activities need to be utilized effectively to improve a journal's knowledge power. Paradigm theories need to be understood to increase a journal's persuasive ability. The Matthew effect within the scientific community should be given attention to strengthen managerial capacity. Further, the advantages of structural holes should be leveraged for a journal to showcase its expressive capability. Fully recognizing the functions of science journals can help reinforce their dissemination capabilities.