Ergonomics in colonoscopy: Its critical role in shaping future practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54844/mr.2024.0578Abstract
Regular screening of the large bowel is crucial for identifying pathology at an early stage, particularly for colorectal cancer, the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide [1]. Early detection can drastically reduce mortality rates, improve quality of life for patients [2], and decrease healthcare costs associated with treating diseases [2], [3]. Several non-invasive screening methods are cost-effective and are valuable solutions for early detection [4], such as the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), which can be done at home at very low cost [5]. Other new solutions are emerging, such as DNA liquid biopsies [6]. However, they are more expensive and have not yet been proven as effective as FIT.
If any of these non-invasive tests result in a positive finding, an optical colonoscopy, a visual inspection of the large bowel, is required since it can take biopsies and remove polyps before they may become cancerous [7]. Colonoscopy is a complex procedure that relies heavily on the technical skills of the operator and requires extensive training [8]. It can cause pain and discomfort for the patient and incur high costs for healthcare, including upfront costs to purchase expensive equipment and ongoing costs for cleaning and maintenance within a dedicated reprocessing unit. Additionally, this procedure poses challenges for healthcare professionals due to the lack of ergonomic design, often resulting in musculoskeletal injuries [9].
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. [PMID: 33538338 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660]
van Erning FN, van Steenbergen LN, Lemmens VEPP, et al. Conditional survival for long-term colorectal cancer survivors in the Netherlands: who do best? Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(10):1731–1739. [PMID: 24814358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.04.009]
Luo Z, Bradley CJ, Dahman BA, Gardiner JC. Colon cancer treatment costs for Medicare and dually eligible beneficiaries. Health Care Financ Rev. 2010;31(1):35–50. [PMID: 20191756]
Tepus M, Yau TO. Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Overview. Gastrointest Tumors. 2020;7(3):62–73. [PMID: 32903904 DOI: 10.1159/000507701]
Mowat C, Digby J, Strachan JA, Steele RJC, Fraser CG. Low Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) for Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps Confirmed Over Clinical Setting, Geography, and FIT System. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(10):3024–3026. [PMID: 31104198 DOI: 10.1007/s10620–019–05661-z]
Torresan S, de Scordilli M, Bortolot M, et al. Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: Onward and upward. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024;194:104242. [PMID: 38128627 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104242]
Mendivil J, Appierto M, Aceituno S, Comas M, Rué M. Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0227251. [PMID: 31891647 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227251]
Kim JS, Kim BW. Training in endoscopy: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(4):318–321. [DOI: 10.5946/ce.2017.096]
Shah SZ, Rehman ST, Khan A, et al. Ergonomics of gastrointestinal endoscopies: Musculoskeletal injury among endoscopy physicians, nurses, and technicians. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;14(3):142–152. [PMID: 35432744 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.142]
Gangwani MK, Aziz A, Dahiya DS, Nawras M, Aziz M, Inamdar S. History of colonoscopy and technological advances: a narrative review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:18. [PMID: 37197258 DOI: 10.21037/tgh-23–4]
Manfredi L. Endorobotics: Design, R&D and Future Trends. Academic Press; 2022.
Manfredi L. Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies. Front Robot AI. 2021;8:705454. [PMID: 34336938 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.705454]
Almashaqbeh SF, Al-Momani S, Khader A, et al. The Effect of Gender and Arm Anatomical Position on the Hand Grip Strength and Fatigue Resistance during Sustained Maximal Handgrip Effort. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2022;12(2):171–180. [PMID: 35433525 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2009–1197]
Kamani L, Kalwar H. Ergonomic injuries in endoscopists and their risk factors. Clin Endosc. 2021;54(3):356–362. [DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.200]
Pawa S, Kwon RS, Fishman DS, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of ergonomics for prevention of endoscopy-related injury: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;98(4):482–491. [PMID: 37245720 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.05.056]
Cosentino F, Tumino E, Passoni GR, Morandi E, Capria A. Functional evaluation of the endotics system, a new disposable self-propelled robotic colonoscope: in vitro tests and clinical trial. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32(8):517–527. [PMID: 19844894 DOI: 10.1177/039139880903200806]
Mathew A, Magerand L, Trucco E, Manfredi L. SoftEnNet: Symbiotic Monocular Depth Estimation and Lumen Segmentation for Colonoscopy Endorobots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.08157. Accessed Jan 19, 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08157
Al-Bander B, Mathew A, Magerand L, Trucco E, Manfredi L. Real-time lumen detection for autonomous colonoscopy. In: MICCAI Workshop on Imaging Systems for GI Endoscopy. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2022: 35–44.
Shubham S, Devendra J. Design Review of Aircraft Cockpit for Aesthetic and Ergonomic Considerations. Int J Sci Res. 2015; 6(2): 39–45.
Published
Issue
Section
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Medical Robotics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.