The use of menstrual cups is associated with the maintenance of healthy vaginal microbiota: A prospective longitudinal study
Menstrual cups is associated with the maintenance of healthy vaginal microbiota
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2022.0288Keywords:
menstrual cup, menstrual collector, sanitary pads, menstruation, vaginal microbiota, sexually transmitted infectionsAbstract
Background: Menstrual cups are reusable flexible collectors adjustable to the body. Besides the economic and environmental advantages, it is possible that the use of menstrual cups influences modifications in the vaginal microbiota. We aimed to evaluate the influence of menstrual cups on the vaginal microbiota of reproductive-age women in comparison to sanitary pads and to determine its acceptance. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted with undergraduate/graduate volunteers, whose usual method of menstrual management was sanitary pads. In the first three menstrual cycles (M1 to M3), participants kept using sanitary pads. In the three consecutive cycles (M4 to M6), they used the menstrual cup offered by the research group. A questionnaire was used to obtain gynecological background and sexual behavior. In the first (M1) and third (M3) follow-up visits, participants underwent gynecological examinations including vaginal microbiota evaluation, oncotic cytology, diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. At each visit, vaginal samples were collected for analysis of microbiota. A generalized linear model with binomial distribution for repeated measures was used and the model was adjusted for confounding factors, using the SAS software. Results and Discussion: We included 47 participants who completed the 6 follow-up examinations. The prevalence of HPV was 48.9% at M1 and 51.1% at M3 and the prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 2.1% and 6.7%, respectively. None of the participants were infected by N. gonorrhoeae or T. vaginalis. One participant had altered cytology results and was referred to the colposcopy service. Patients with C. trachomatis and/or altered vaginal microbiota were treated. During the three months of sanitary pad usage, 27.7%, 12.8%, and 10.6% of women presented altered vaginal microbiota (bacterial vaginosis, intermediate microbiota, aerobic vaginitis, and/or vulvovaginal candidiasis), while only 8.5%, 12.8% and 8.5% of them had vaginal dysbiosis while using a menstrual cup (P = 0.04). Overall acceptance of menstrual cups among those who completed all the examinations was 93.6%. Conclusion: Our results show that menstrual cups are associated with the maintenance of healthy vaginal microbiota. Additionally, the acceptance of menstrual cups was high in our population.
References
Pena EF. Menstrual protection. Advantages of the menstrual cup. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;19:684–687.
Howard C, Rose CL, Trouton K, et al. FLOW (finding lasting options for women):multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing tampons with menstrual cups. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(6):e208–e215.
Phillips-Howard PA, Nyothach E, Ter Kuile FO, et al. Menstrual cups and sanitary pads to reduce school attrition, and sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study in rural Western Kenya. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013229.
Stewart K, Greer R, Powell M. Women’s experience of using the Mooncup. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):285–287.
North BB, Oldham MJ. Preclinical, clinical, and over-the-counter postmarketing experience with a new vaginal cup: menstrual collection. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(2):303–311.
Beksinska ME, Smit J, Greener R, et al. Acceptability and performance of the menstrual cup in South Africa: a randomized crossover trial comparing the menstrual cup to tampons or sanitary pads. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;2 (2):151–158.
Coswosk ÉD, Neves-Silva P, Modena CM, Heller L. Having a toilet is not enough: the limitations in fulfilling the human rights to water and sanitation in a municipal school in Bahia, Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):137.
Czekalski Lobascz B, Reis MBF, Mendes GPMET, Cruz DCO, Damaceno MJCF, Sartorao Filho CI. Determinants of menstrual cup use among undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160(3):1007–1011.
Spiegel CA. Bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991;4(4):485–502.
Rönnqvist PDJ, Forsgren-Brusk UB, Grahn-Håkansson EE. Lactobacilli in the female genital tract in relation to other genital microbes and vaginal pH. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(6):726–735.
Boskey ER, Cone RA, Whaley KJ, Moench TR. Origins of vaginal acidity: high D/L lactate ratio is consistent with bacteria being the primary source. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(9):1809–1813.
Sweet RL. Gynecologic conditions and bacterial vaginosis: implications for the non-pregnant patient. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2000;8(3–4):184–190.
Guaschino S, De Santo D, De Seta F. New perspectives in antibiotic prophylaxis for obstetric and gynaecological surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2002;50(Suppl A):S13–S16.
Platz-Christensen JJ, Pernevi P, Hagmar B, Andersson E, Brandberg Å, Wiqvist N. A longitudinal follow-up of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(2):99–102.
Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(1):139–147.
Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(5):663–668.
Sobel JD. Bacterial vaginosis. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:349–356.
Mengistie Z, Woldeamanuel Y, Asrat D, Adera A. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Tikur Anbessa University Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:822.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297–301.
Cibley LJ, Cibley LJ. Cytolytic vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 2):1245–1249.
Donders GGG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG. 2002;109(1):34–43.
Williamson AL, Rybicki EP. Detection of genita l human papillomaviruses by polymerase chain reaction amplification with degenerate nested primers. J Med Virol. 1991;33(3):165–171.
Griffais R, Thibon M. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction. Res Microbiol. 1989;140(2):139–141.
Goire N, Nissen MD, LeCornec GM, Sloots TP, Whiley DM. A duplex Neisseria gonorrhoeae real-time polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the gonococcal porA pseudogene and multicopy opa genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;61(1):6–12.
de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ. The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol. 1995;76 (Pt 4):1057–1062.
Pangarkar MA. The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology. Cytojournal. 2022;19:28.
Tessandier N, Uysal IB, Elie B, et al. Does exposure to different menstrual products affect the vaginal environment? Mol Ecol. 2022.
Neumann C, Kaiser R, Bauer J. Menstrual cup-associated toxic shock syndrome. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2020;7(10):001825.
Mitchell MA, Bisch S, Arntfield S, Hosseini-Moghaddam SM. A confirmed case of toxic shock syndrome associated with the use of a menstrual cup. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2015;26(4):218–220.
Juma J, Nyothach E, Laserson KF, et al. Examining the safety of menstrual cups among rural primary school girls in western Kenya: observational studies nested in a randomised controlled feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2017;(4):e015429.
van Eijk AM, Zulaika G, Lenchner M, et al. Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(8):e376–e393.
Arenas-Gallo C, Ramírez-Rocha G, González-Hakspiel L, Merlano-Alcendra C, Palomino-Suárez D, Rueda-Espinel S. [Acceptability and safety of the menstrual cup: a systematic review of the literature]. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2020;71(2):163–177.
Gharacheh M, Ranjbar F, Hajinasab N, Haghani S. Acceptability and safety of the menstrual cups among Iranian women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):105.
Colpani V, Soares Falcetta F, Bacelo Bidinotto A, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Brazil: a systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229154.
Suehiro TT, Gimenes F, Souza RP, et al. High molecular prevalence of HPV and other sexually transmitted infections in a population of asymptomatic women who work or study at a Brazilian university. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2021;63:e1.
Vodstrcil LA, Muzny CA, Plummer EL, Sobel JD, Bradshaw CS. Bacterial vaginosis: drivers of recurrence and challenges and opportunities in partner treatment. BMC Med. 2021;19(1):194.
Nelson TM, Borgogna JC, Michalek RD, et al. Cigarette smoking is associated with an altered vaginal tract metabolomic profile. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):852.
Critchley HOD, Babayev E, Bulun SE, et al. Menstruation: science and society. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):624–664.
The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. Accessed December 6, 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2022.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Placenta and Reproductive Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
