New labor management and obstetric outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2023.0319Keywords:
Friedman labor curve, Zhang's labor curve, labor management, obstetric outcomeAbstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the new labor management guideline with the traditional WHO guideline with regard to obstetric outcomes. Methods: The literature search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and Chinese databases (including CNKI, WanFang Database and VIP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies comparing the new labor management and the old WHO guideline in terms of maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk pregnant women were included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk Bias Evaluation Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The I2 statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity. We used the random-effects model to pool the relative risk (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the potential influencing factors. Publication bias analysis was also assessed based on funnel plots. Results: A total of 45 studies with a total sample size of 82,016 women were eventually included, with 15 RCTs and 30 cohort studies. 44 studies were included for data synthesis. Women with new labor management had less labor augmentation with oxytocin (RCTs: RR = 0.55 [0.36, 0.83], I2 = 47%; cohort studies: RR = 0.62 [0.55, 0.70], I2 = 58%), intrapartum cesarean section (RCTs: RR = 0.52 [0.47, 0.59], I2 = 0; cohort studies: RR = 0.61 [0.55, 0.67], I2= 75%) and operative vaginal delivery (RCTs: RR = 0.60 [0.42, 0.87], I2 = 0; cohort studies: RR = 0.69 [0.55, 0.86], I2 = 82%) without increasing the incidence of 3rd- and 4th-degree perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, infectious morbidity and postpartum urine retention, fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. These results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Our study indicates that the new labor management guideline may be more beneficial than the traditional WHO guideline, with fewer intrapartum interventions and no increase in adverse obstetric outcomes.
References
Williams JW. Obstetrics: A Text-book for the Use of Students and Practitioners: Appleton. D. Appleton and Company; 1903.
Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6(6):567–589.
Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in Primigravidae. I. The alert line for detecting abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79(7):592–598.
Philpott RH, Castle WM. Cervicographs in the management of labour in Primigravidae. II. The action line and treatment of abnormal labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79(7):599–602.
World health organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization maternal health and safe motherhood programme. Lancet. 1994;343(8910):1399–1404.
World Health Organization. Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. Preventing prolonged labour: a practical guide: the partograph. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/58903
World Health Organization. The Partograph: the application of the WHO partograph in the management of labour, report of a WHO multicentre study, 1990-1991. No. WHO/FHE/MSM/94.4. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/58589
Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK, et al. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(4):824–828.
Neal JL, Lowe NK, Patrick TE, Cabbage LA, Corwin EJ. What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(4):361–369.
Zhang J, Landy HJ, Ware Branch D, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287.
Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver J, Zhang J. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):419.e1–419.e4199.
Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693–711.
Expert Consensus on new Labor Standards and Management (2014). Chin J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;49(7):486–486.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, Median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
Liu YZ. [Comparative analysis of the clinical application value of the new and old labor standards]. Med Innov China. 2016;13(24):120–123.
Huang QM, Chen H, Liang MJ, et al. [The effect of application of new labor standard on pregnancy outcome]. Hainan Med J. 2017;28(06):989–990.
Wang JL, Liu L. [The effect of new labor standards and patterns of midwifery on the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (forceps delivery, caesarean section, and neonatal asphyxia)]. Psychologist. 2017;23(5):61–62.
Ma HM. [Application of the new labor standard and its influence on pregnancy outcome]. China Pract Med. 2018;13(27).
Zhuang HY. [The influence of clinical labor on labor outcome based on new labor process standards]. Heilongjiang Med J. 2018;42(7).
Li MB, Ren ZF. [Comparison of clinical application of old and new labor curves in spontaneous delivery among primipara]. Ningxia Med J. 2019;41(01):76–77.
Liao XM. [The application of new labor time observation method in parturition]. China Med Pharm. 2019;9(24):114–116.
Zhang M, Zhang Q, Zhang B. [Effect of new labor standard on indications of cesarean section and pregnancy outcomes during labor]. Spec Health. 2019(19):141–142.
Zhong J, Su QP. [Analysis of the influence of new labor standard on clinical indications and prognosis of mother and newborn during labor]. Bao Jian Wen Hui 2019(9):19–20.
Zhou L. [Analysis of the effect of labor management on pregnancy outcome]. Psychol Mon. 2019;14(16):145.
Bernitz S, Dalbye R, Zhang J, et al. The frequency of intrapartum Caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang’s guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS):a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):340–348.
Zeng R. [Effect of new labor standard on spontaneous delivery and pregnancy outcomes]. Health Everyone. 2020(12):83.
Zhang WQ. [The effect of labor management according to new labor standard in painless labor on maternal and infant outcomes]. China Mod Med. 2020;27(2).
Chen QM, Su ML. [Effect of implementation of new labor standard on maternal and infant outcomes]. Clin Med Eng. 2021;28(4):487–488.
Han WY, Li LX, Li MQ, Chen N, Li XY, Zhu XM. [Effect of labor management based on new labor standard on maternal labor outcome]. J Xinxiang Med Univ. 2021;38(5):418–421,426.
Lin XL, Mei SZ, Zhang MJ. [Clinical analysis of pregnancy outcomes of 755 parturients based on the new labor standard]. Heilong Med J. 2016;40(10):905–907.
Lv XH, Chen N, Wang CX. [Effect of new labor standard on pregnancy outcomes of spontaneous delivery pregnant women]. J Med Forum. 2016;37(7):70–71.
Zhang CC, Li J, Xia YX. Effect of old and new labor management on pregnancy outcomes. Chin J Disaster Med. 2016;4(12).
Zhang HR. [Comparative study on the clinical application of old and new labor curves]. Gansu Prov: Lanzhou Univ. 2016.
Jin Q. [Effect of new labor standard on spontaneous delivery and pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women]. World Mother Infant. 2017;(22):37.
Li M, Li Y, Yu JM, Niu BL. [Effect of new labor standard on indications of intrapartum caesarean section]. World Mother Infant. 2017;(19):68.
Wang Y, Yue YF, He XY. [Effect of implementing modified new labor standard on reducing intrapartum cesarean section rate and maternal and infant outcomes]. J Int Obstet Gynecol. 2017;44(06):633–635,641.
Wang DR, Ye SL, Tao LY, Wang YQ. [Effects of new and old labor standards on maternal and infant outcomes]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017;18(06):507–510.
Wei L, Yan TT, Fan L. [Comparison of labor and pregnancy outcomes in 8025 patients with vaginal delivery under old and new labor management]. Chin J Fam Plan. 2017;25(07):459–462.
Yang FX. [Effect of new labor standard on indications of intrapartum cesarean section and pregnancy outcome during labor]. Chin J Fam Plan. 2017;25(2):101–103,111.
Zhao N, Li N, Jiang XM, Qu XJ, Qi YL, Pang NN. [Effects of new labor standards on clinical indications and maternal and infant outcomes during labor]. Prog in Mod Biomed. 2017;17(27):5362–5364,5372.
Li J. [Effect of new labor management on cesarean section rate and pregnancy outcome]. Mod Instrum Med Treat. 2018;24(5):134–135,138.
Li J. [Clinical effect of new labor management on reducing cesarean section rate and maternal and infant outcomes]. Syst Med. 2018;3(21):111–113.
Zhang DD, Wang NN, Pan DH. [The influence of new labor standard on indications of cesarean section and pregnancy outcome]. Mod Diagn Treat. 2018;29(11):1765–1766.
Li HY, Chang Q, Zheng CM, Wang D. [Effect of new labor standard implementation on low-risk pregnant women's pregnancy outcomes]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electronic Edition). 2019;15(2):180–185.
Liu Q, Liu GR, Guo P. [Clinical application effect of new labor standard in parturient women]. China Mod Med. 2019;26(22):101–103.
Wei JF. [The application of new labor standards in promoting spontaneous labor]. Chin J Mod Drug Appl. 2019;13(4):51–52.
Yang SS, Xue J, Zheng W. [Retrospective analysis of the application of new labor standard in labor management in primary hospital]. China Med Pharm. 2019;9(14):68–70.
Zhang J, Cui JH, Zhou WJ, Xin ZQ. [Analysis of indications and outcomes of the intrapartum cesarean section under new and old labor standards]. Chin J Clin Ration Drug Use. 2019;12(19):151–152.
Bai XR, Xue YY. [Effect of new labor stage standard on delivery mode of primipara and adverse neonatal outcomes]. Clin Res Pract. 2020;5(7):144–145,148.
Liu FH. [A comparative study of pregnancy outcomes by new and old labor standards]. Guide China Med. 2020;18(13):122–123.
Quan GM. [A comparative study on the application of old and new labor curves in spontaneous delivery of primipara]. Med Diet Health. 2020;(16):206, 208.
Shi DD, Cheng Y, Zhang QY. [Effect of the application of new labor standard on maternal and infant outcomes]. Chin J Birth Health Hered. 2021;29(9):1276–1280.
Sun NM, An L, Xiong YM, Zhou M. [Study on the correlation between the new labor standard and intrapartum cesarean section after latent phase]. Electron J Clin Med Lit. 2021;8(13):39–42.
Zheng XX, Liu Z, Chen AP. [Effect of painless labor combined with new labor management on pregnancy outcomes and maternal and infant prognosis of low-risk women]. Doctor. 2021;6(14):43–46.
Li X, Wu C, Zhou X, et al. Influence of painless delivery on the maternal and neonatal outcomes under the guidance of new concept of labor. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(11):12973–12979.
Wang Y, Cheng XY. [Effect of new labor standard on the rate of intrapartum cesarean section and maternal and infant complications]. Contemp Med. 2022;28(18):9–11.
Thuillier C, Roy S, Peyronnet V, Quibel T, Nlandu A, Rozenberg P. Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):341.e1-341341.e9.
Wilson-Leedy JG, DiSilvestro AJ, Repke JT, Pauli JM. Reduction in the cesarean delivery rate after obstetric care consensus guideline implementation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):145–152.
Yan SS, Xiao L. [Effect of new labor standard and midwifery patterns on the incidence of forceps assisted delivery, intrapartum cesarean section and neonatal asphyxia]. Chin J Perinat Med. 2016;19(4):315–317.
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215
Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6):CD007123.
Berglund S, Grunewald C, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S. Severe asphyxia due to delivery-related malpractice in Sweden 1990-2005. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(3):316–323.
Berglund S, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S, Grunewald C. How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(8):968-978.
Espada-Trespalacios X, Ojeda F, Perez-Botella M, et al. Oxytocin administration in low-risk women, a retrospective analysis of birth and neonatal outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4375.
WHO. WHO labour care guide: user’s manual. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017566
Mathai M, Sanghvi H, Guidotti RJ. Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and doctors. Accessed June 28, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255760/9789241565493-eng.pdf;sequence=1
Jalloul RJ, Bury-Fiol A, Ibarra CJ, Chen HY, Sibai BM, Ward C. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after cesarean delivery for active phase arrest following adoption of the obstetric care consensus guidelines. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(1):51–56.
Nunes JP, Pinto PV, Neves AM, et al. Concerns about the contemporary labor curves and guidelines: Is it time to revisit the old ones? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;270:169–175.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Placenta and Reproductive Medicine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
