Reassessing the Bishop score in clinical practice for induction of labor leading to vaginal delivery and for evaluation of cervix ripening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2023.0353References
Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266-268.
Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):486.e1-486.e9.
Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, et al. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h217.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-523.
Saccone G, Della Corte L, Maruotti GM, et al. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(8):958-966.
Kolkman DG, Verhoeven CJ, Brinkhorst SJ, et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(8):625-630.
Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):805-811.
Yellon SM. Immunobiology of cervix ripening. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3156.
Danforth DN, Veis A, Breen M, Weinstein HG, Buckingham JC, Manalo P. The effect of pregnancy and labor on the human cervix: changes in collagen, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;120(5):641-651.
Golub MS, Donald JM, Anderson JH, Ford EW. A labor readiness index (Bishop score) for rhesus monkeys. Lab Animal Sci. 1988;38(4):435-438.
Osman I, Young A, Ledingham MA, et al. Leukocyte density and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in human fetal membranes, decidua, cervix and myometrium before and during labour at term. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9(1):41-45.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386-397.
Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):69-79.
Jayyosi C, Lee N, Willcockson A, Nallasamy S, Mahendroo M, Myers K. The mechanical response of the mouse cervix to tensile cyclic loading in term and preterm pregnancy. Acta Biomater. 2018;78:308-319.
Yellon SM. Contributions to the dynamics of cervix remodeling prior to term and preterm birth. Biol Reprod. 2017;96(1):13-23.
Dubicke A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Mazurek P, Miller L, Yellon SM. Density of stromal cells and macrophages associated with collagen remodeling in the human cervix in preterm and term birth. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(5):595-603.
De Vivo V, Carbone L, Saccone G, et al. Early amniotomy after cervical ripening for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):320-329.
Kuba K, Estrada-Trejo F, Lambert C, et al. Novel evidence-based labor induction algorithm associated with increased vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39(15):1622-1632.
Alanwar A, Hussein SH, Allam HA, et al. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score in labor induction at term for prediction of Caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(13):2146-2153.
Hantoushzadeh S, Saleh M, Nouri B. Which cervical sonographic markers of preterm birth occur earlier? Can these markers be effective in determining the type of interventions? Issues that have not been well considered. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(3):449-450.
Thomsen CR, Jensen MSS, Leonhard AK, et al. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(2):241-247.
Masson LE, O’Brien CM, Gautam R, et al. Invivo Raman spectroscopy monitors cervical change during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):275.e1-275.e14.
Buxton MA, Meraz-Cruz N, Sanchez BN, et al. Timing of cervico-vaginal cytokine collection during pregnancy and preterm birth: a comparative analysis in the PRINCESA cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3436.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Placenta and Reproductive Medicine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.