Reassessing the Bishop score in clinical practice for induction of labor leading to vaginal delivery and for evaluation of cervix ripening

Authors

  • Kfier Kuba Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwell Health - Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park 11040, NY, USA
  • Michael A. Kirby Departments of Pathology and Human Anatomy, and Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda 92350, CA, USA
  • Francine Hughes Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx 10461, NY, USA
  • Steven M. Yellon Longo Center for Perinatal Biology, Departments of Basic Sciences (Division of Physiology), Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda 92350, CA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54844/prm.2023.0353

Author Biographies

Kfier Kuba, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Northwell Health - Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park 11040, NY, USA

 

 

Michael A. Kirby, Departments of Pathology and Human Anatomy, and Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda 92350, CA, USA

deceased

 

Francine Hughes, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women’s Health, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx 10461, NY, USA

 

 

 

Steven M. Yellon, Longo Center for Perinatal Biology, Departments of Basic Sciences (Division of Physiology), Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda 92350, CA, USA

 

 

 

References

Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266-268.

Laughon SK, Zhang J, Grewal J, Sundaram R, Beaver J, Reddy UM. Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):486.e1-486.e9.

Alfirevic Z, Keeney E, Dowswell T, et al. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h217.

Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513-523.

Saccone G, Della Corte L, Maruotti GM, et al. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(8):958-966.

Kolkman DG, Verhoeven CJ, Brinkhorst SJ, et al. The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(8):625-630.

Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, Sun L, Reddy UM. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):805-811.

Yellon SM. Immunobiology of cervix ripening. Front Immunol. 2019;10:3156.

Danforth DN, Veis A, Breen M, Weinstein HG, Buckingham JC, Manalo P. The effect of pregnancy and labor on the human cervix: changes in collagen, glycoproteins, and glycosaminoglycans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;120(5):641-651.

Golub MS, Donald JM, Anderson JH, Ford EW. A labor readiness index (Bishop score) for rhesus monkeys. Lab Animal Sci. 1988;38(4):435-438.

Osman I, Young A, Ledingham MA, et al. Leukocyte density and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in human fetal membranes, decidua, cervix and myometrium before and during labour at term. Mol Hum Reprod. 2003;9(1):41-45.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386-397.

Word RA, Li XH, Hnat M, Carrick K. Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. Semin Reprod Med. 2007;25(1):69-79.

Jayyosi C, Lee N, Willcockson A, Nallasamy S, Mahendroo M, Myers K. The mechanical response of the mouse cervix to tensile cyclic loading in term and preterm pregnancy. Acta Biomater. 2018;78:308-319.

Yellon SM. Contributions to the dynamics of cervix remodeling prior to term and preterm birth. Biol Reprod. 2017;96(1):13-23.

Dubicke A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Mazurek P, Miller L, Yellon SM. Density of stromal cells and macrophages associated with collagen remodeling in the human cervix in preterm and term birth. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(5):595-603.

De Vivo V, Carbone L, Saccone G, et al. Early amniotomy after cervical ripening for induction of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(4):320-329.

Kuba K, Estrada-Trejo F, Lambert C, et al. Novel evidence-based labor induction algorithm associated with increased vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Am J Perinatol. 2022;39(15):1622-1632.

Alanwar A, Hussein SH, Allam HA, et al. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score in labor induction at term for prediction of Caesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(13):2146-2153.

Hantoushzadeh S, Saleh M, Nouri B. Which cervical sonographic markers of preterm birth occur earlier? Can these markers be effective in determining the type of interventions? Issues that have not been well considered. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;226(3):449-450.

Thomsen CR, Jensen MSS, Leonhard AK, et al. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(2):241-247.

Masson LE, O’Brien CM, Gautam R, et al. Invivo Raman spectroscopy monitors cervical change during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):275.e1-275.e14.

Buxton MA, Meraz-Cruz N, Sanchez BN, et al. Timing of cervico-vaginal cytokine collection during pregnancy and preterm birth: a comparative analysis in the PRINCESA cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3436.

Published

2023-06-29

Issue

Section

Commentary

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.